Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Don’t Fall for This PayPal Deposit Scam

MrConsumer received this email last week, indicating that there was a pending charge of almost $1,000 on his PayPal account and that a deposit had also been made to it:


PayPal Scam email

While normally I would merely click the junk button in my email program when getting an email like this, I decided to look a little further.

Checking the email header confirmed that PayPal was the actual sender.

*MOUSE PRINT:

PayPal email header

Hovering over the “Go to PayPal” button revealed that the link was also to the actual PayPal site. Rather than clicking it, I went directly to PayPay in my browser to check on my account. This is what I found there.

PayPal scam deposit

To my shock, the actual PayPal website said that there was a pending charge of $987.90 coming to my PayPal account. And it showed an actual transaction that was a test deposit into my account of one Japanese yen. Presumably this was to ensure my account was valid.

I immediately changed my password, and searched the PayPal site to dispute the forthcoming charge. Entering information about the actual transaction that was there — the one yen deposit — resulted in an error indicating that that transaction could not be disputed.

So I called customer service at PayPal using a number I had in my rolodex (888-221-1161) and NOT using the number the email had provided to dispute the transaction. (That step was key so as not to fall for any possible scam.)

After being forced to go through a number of AI prompts to direct my call, I was finally able to speak to a real person. She indicated that I had nothing to worry about — a fraudulent charge was not about to be deducted from my account. She said this was a phishing scam that they were aware of and that it used a real link to PayPal as part of the deception.

The one yen test deposit was a means of making the transaction look legitimate. That action forced PayPal to send me a real confirmation email, and to list the transaction on their website.

But how did the scammers get PayPal to also communicate that a nearly $1,000 charge was pending? It seems that some senders of money like these scammers can put whatever message they want in the subject line of the email that PayPal sends to recipients of money. It will also appear on the PayPal website.

So for one yen, which is worth a little more than half a cent, the scammers can make their pending charge look legitimate and trick people into calling their own 800 number. Clever. Very clever.

A word to the wise… if you get a similar email, do not under any circumstances call the 800 number shown. But you can contact the real PayPal to check on the legitimacy of the transaction posted. And do forward a copy of the email to them: Phishing@PayPal.com

Here are some tips from PayPal to avoid phishing scams.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Bing News Stories Not Always New Stories

Every week, MrConsumer skims thousands of news story headlines to find the three dozen or so he presents in Consumer World. Over the past month, however, he has noticed that some news stories that are presented as only a few hours old in Bing News are anything but.

For example, last week he saw this story headline about Kroger deciding to no longer accept Visa credit cards. Certainly a story like that would be of great interest to many Consumer World readers.

Bing News Kroger story

*MOUSE PRINT:

Clicking that headline link brings a big surprise.

Bing Kroger story

The Kroger story that Bing said was just an hour old was actually posted online in 2018 — eight years earlier!

Here are some other recent examples of news stories presented as hot off the press but which are actually anything but.

Old news presented as new on Bing News

We asked the PR agency for Microsoft last week to explain why this is happening, for how long, and what is the company going to do to correct it. Through the agency, a Microsoft spokesperson responded:

“A small number of older stories were inadvertently included in Bing News and appeared as newly published. Our teams have identified the issue and are working to implement a fix.”

Hats off to Microsoft for taking quick action to put the “new” back in Bing News, but as of today (April 20), old news is still presented as new.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Lawsuit: Safe Melt Not Safe for Pets

Safe MeltIn March, two New York consumers sued the manufacturer of Safe Melt — a snow and ice melter specifically marketed to pet owners as “pet safe” and “pet friendly.” [See complaint.]

After walking on areas treated with Safe Melt, which is 100% magnesium chloride, their dogs suffered various injuries including paw and skin irritation and lesions, and one dog developed kidney disease and died.

*MOUSE PRINT:

The lawsuit contends:

… Safe Melt is not safe for pets. It is composed entirely of magnesium chloride (“MCL”), which is harmful for pets to ingest and dangerous for them to touch. Safe Melt can cause gastrointestinal irritation, diarrhea, bloody vomiting, respiratory depression, kidney failure, and cardiac arrest to pets that eat it, lick it, or groom their paws after walking over it. It can also cause chemical burns, cracked paw pads, and painful irritation if it gets embedded in pets’ fur or has direct contact with their skin.

Apparently the company contends that the “pet safe” claim refers to the fact that their product comes in round pellets, rather than sharp, jagged crystals which could cut into pets’ paws. And their website says that the product “won’t burn or irritate pets’ paws.”

The consumers say they paid a premium price for this supposedly safe product and want their money back. The lawyers are suing claiming misrepresentation and false advertising.

If you see a claim on ice melter that says “safe for pets,” what do you understand that to mean?

Share this story:

 


ADV